Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=Z_W3X--5SVacWKkfFL1dH5Y3W0DL1WWtVNkDR@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 12:45 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: >> >>> Quorum commit, even with configurable vote weights, can't handle a >> >>> requirement that a particular commit be replicated to (A || B) && (C >> >>> || D). >> >> Good point. > > Asking for quorum_commit = 3 would cover that requirement. > > Not exactly as requested, but in a way that is both simpler to express > and requires no changes to configuration after failover. ISTM better to > have a single parameter than 5 separate configuration files, with > behaviour that the community would not easily be able to validate. That's just not the same thing. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: