Re: Why facebook used mysql ?
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why facebook used mysql ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=XvfbFKQ2kRNOorxf9M4ZD60DqQWFkpe6XMir3@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why facebook used mysql ? (Sandeep Srinivasa <sss@clearsenses.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why facebook used mysql ?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Sandeep Srinivasa <sss@clearsenses.com> wrote: > There was an interesting post today on highscalability > - http://highscalability.com/blog/2010/11/4/facebook-at-13-million-queries-per-second-recommends-minimiz.html > The discussion/comments touched upon why mysql is a better idea for Facebook > than Postgres. Here's an interesting one postgresql might not be a good fit for this type of application, but the reasoning given in the article is really suspicious. The true answer was hinted at in the comments: "we chose it first, and there was never a reason to change it". It really comes down to they probably don't need much from the database other than a distributed key value store, and they built a big software layer on top of that to manage it. Hm, I use facebook and I've seen tons of inconsistent answers, missing notifications and such. I wonder if there's a connection there... merlin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: