Re: exposing COPY API
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: exposing COPY API |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTi=Xu_oj_ogut_XwgFYA+DZZevvfGyawsNdp0Uvj@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: exposing COPY API (Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: exposing COPY API
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:49:36 -0500 > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Shigeru HANADA >> <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp> wrote: >> > I'll submit revised file_fdw patch after removing IsForeignTable() >> > catalog lookup along Heikki's proposal. >> >> So I'm a bit confused. I don't see the actual copy API change patch >> anywhere here. Are we close to getting something committed there? > > I'm sorry but I might have missed your point... > > I replied here to answer to Itagaki-san's mention about typos in > file_fdw patch. > > Or, would you mean that file_fdw should not depend on "copy API change" > patch? I mean that this thread is entitled "exposing copy API", and I'm wondering when and if the patch to expose the COPY API is going to be committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: