Re: Slow count(*) again...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Samuel Gendler
Тема Re: Slow count(*) again...
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTi=WE-CsGVC3j4CX9ddGGsRZ3Mmk6aJGKk4NT=g6@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Slow count(*) again...  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Slow count(*) again...  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
Re: Slow count(*) again...  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-performance


On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

This is a problem for the operating system to solve, and such solutions out there are already good enough that PostgreSQL has little reason to try and innovate in this area.  I routinely see seq scan throughput double on Linux just by tweaking read-ahead from the tiny defaults to a sane value.

I spent some time going through the various tuning docs on the wiki whie bringing some new hardware up and I can't remember seeing any discussion of tweaking read-ahead at all in the normal performance-tuning references.  Do you have any documentation of the kinds of tweaking you have done and its effects on different types of workloads?

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Neil Whelchel
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Slow count(*) again...
Следующее
От: Scott Carey
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Slow count(*) again...