Re: idea to have driver return immediately after a query
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: idea to have driver return immediately after a query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=UMTRmDTdhtRkkaNyqM-iNk99h3cgzgL32RUqr@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: idea to have driver return immediately after a query (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: idea to have driver return immediately after a query
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com> wrote: > On 25 March 2011 13:40, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote: >> It was suggested by Robert Haas that it would be possible to return >> from a query immediately instead of reading the entire result set. >> Instead of reading it we just let the O/S buffer the results until we >> get around to reading it. Before I go to the trouble of prototyping >> this can anyone see a reason why this wouldn't work ? > > What happens if the app then wants to run another query before reading > the resultset? One common case is going to be run query - inspect > resultset metadata - driver has to run internal queries to return that > metadata. I'm a little worried about error handling too. > > For queries in a transaction, it might make sense to implement this > via portals, much as done for fetchsize (i.e. always ask for only 1 > row initially, and read that immediately; then reading the resultset > beyond the first row triggers a fetch of the rest of the resultset as > if you had set a large fetchsize). Then you don't have to worry about > tying up the connection with an unread resultset. Though this means > you have to use a named statement and lose the unnamed statement > planning tweaks; and you will have to wait for the query to produce at > least one row before returning. > > There are various things that the wire protocol / backend could do > better here - a portal equivalent to DECLARE CURSOR WITH HOLD, and > some way to say "defer planning on this named statement until Bind > please", would both be useful. > > Oliver I've included Robert on this email as he intimated that he if protocol changes were made he would be interested in implementing them. Dave >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: