Re: template0 database comment
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: template0 database comment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=RVH02aetif+_MYQ4Vw6u2qSbaTSph0pcWoZgO@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: template0 database comment (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: template0 database comment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 15 March 2011 15:37, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Thom Brown wrote: >> On 15 March 2011 15:26, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> > >> > Applied. ?I did not bump the catalog version because they are just >> > comments. ?I assume that is the right procedure. >> >> *SNIP* >> >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? "COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres IS 'default administrative connection database';\n", >> >> Default administrative connection database? Where's the "connection" >> bit come from? > > There was discussion that 'postgres' is the database that is used for > performing administrative connections, e.g. createdb. Yeah, kind of > odd, but that's what it is used for. Hmm... there's actually no mention of that in the docs for such tools: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/app-createdb.html There's also little mention of this "administrative" database in the docs beyond saying it's merely a copy of template1 used as a default database for users and applications to connect to. I also notice there's no choice but to use the "postgres" database with these tools. Shouldn't we have an option that allows us to specify an alternative database? e.g. createdb -d alternativedb newdb -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: