Re: Trac tickets
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Trac tickets |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=OEhTVO9_TSDQqPNMCV22noskVXQDWMG2X+UzJ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Trac tickets (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Trac tickets
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 14:09, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le vendredi 7 août 2009 à 13:35:51, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:48, Dave Page<dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Guillaume >> > >> > Lelarge<guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> >> Le jeudi 6 août 2009 à 13:10:24, Dave Page a écrit : >> >>> Why are trac tickets being created for the recent change history? >> >>> That's what the changelog and svn history is for... >> >> >> >> Yes. I created them to try to use the roadmap system. See this: >> >> >> >> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/roadmap >> >> and this: >> >> >> >> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/query?milestone=1.10.1&order=priority&col= >> >>id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&col=compone >> >>nt (which is kind of a changelog and a todo list) >> > >> > OK, well if you want to start maintaining this, please have a think >> > about how we can modify the existing processes to accomodate it. At >> > the very least, I would like to avoid the changelog duplication - can >> > we drop that file, or auto-create it for example? >> >> Yes, we should definitely be able to do that. However, I think we >> should do *both* for a while just to fill things with some data, so we >> can reasonably compare the outcome. yes, it means duplicated work >> during that time, but as long as we have the end-goal to drop one of >> the two. > > Dropping one is not enough. We need to have more. And trac gives us more than > just a changelog. So, I agree with Magnus. We should really check that trac > works great enough for us before dropping any existing processes. Here's to bring up a really old thread. We've run it for a while now. Are we ready to drop the changelog and use trac reports instead? Or are we ready to drop the changelog and use git log? Or a combination, for different users? (Hint: I hate the changelog file because I keep forgetting to update it, and it sucks to handle it in the main repo due to how it integrates with branches) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: