Re: pgAdmin III: error while browsing schema of PG database
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgAdmin III: error while browsing schema of PG database |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTi=NkwzhXUyAvRFB42cMHoDhRerxyTGPoZc=V-Qy@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgAdmin III: error while browsing schema of PG database (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgAdmin III: error while browsing schema of PG database
|
| Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S <nixmisc@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode for >>>> me. I too was puzzled about the minimum version check being EDBAS >>>> specific. >>>> >>> >>> Just checked. The version checker function checks for the version number >>> and >>> also for a bool which is set to true in EDBAS mode. So yeah, this will not >>> be repro in pure Postgresql mode operations. Sorry for indicating so. But >>> the issue defo comes if you try to browse a PG database in EDBAS mode. >> >> Why would you browse a PG database in EDBAS mode? Isn't there a whole >> lot of other things that would break in that case as well? >> >> Or maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean with "EDBAS mode"? >> > > He means when edbas is running in PG mode instead of Oracle mode. Ah, that makes more sense. And pgadmin incorrectly identifies that as an oracle-mode ebas server? In that case, isn't the actual problem that it's identified as edbas and not pg? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: