Re: Postgres Replication Options
От | Rosser Schwarz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres Replication Options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=NfELZBrv64StTvtLkX=x3qTyj+zUTf3QRWn4t@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres Replication Options ("Rangi, Jai" <jrangi@automotive.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Rangi, Jai <jrangi@automotive.com> wrote: > I am looking for a replication solution for PG 9.x. Idea is to have one > master replication server and multiple (around 20) slave servers read only. I know (anecdotally) of at least one organization that's using Bucardo [1] to synchronize many more machines than that. I've used it to manage eight to ten slaves, simultaneously with master-master replication without significant issue, and with a replication lag typically in the low single-digit seconds, at the outside. In order to reduce replication overhead and keep things performant with as many slaves as you're talking about, you might want to use "cascaded" slaves, where the R/W master updates a subset of the slaves, which then propagate the changes to slaves of their own. Look at the documentation for "makedelta" to enable cascading slave tiers. rls [1] http://bucardo.org -- :wq
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: