Re: Replication server timeout patch
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Replication server timeout patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTi=NLYT=8dMcR4fB5qvk2L7JF41KuQB_aDVpE+wN@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Replication server timeout patch (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Replication server timeout patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> On 30.03.2011 10:58, Fujii Masao wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas >>> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> + A value of zero means wait forever. This parameter can only be >>> set in >>> >>> The first sentence sounds misleading. Even if you set the parameter to >>> zero, >>> replication connections can be terminated because of keepalive or socket >>> error. >> >> Hmm, should I change it back to "A value of zero disables the timeout" ? Any >> better suggestions? > > I like that. But I appreciate if anyone suggests the better. Maybe sticking the word "mechanism" in there would be a bit better. "A value of zero disables the timeout mechanism"? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: