Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTi=LpmeivefHLRFS-OXDUzf=HC5VZ4ttZwx3cnK4@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 06.12.2010 15:53, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> I guess. It still seems far too much like exposing the server's guts >> for my taste. It might not be as bad as the expression tree stuff, >> but there's nothing particularly good about it either. > > Note that we already have txid_current_snapshot() function, which exposes > all that. Fair enough, and I think that's actually useful for Slony &c. But I don't think we should shy away of providing a cleaner API here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: