Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=Lg-dRkavA-FMP_KWHAq7kMqt28hX-V6HWZsi0@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > "All standbys" has no meaning without registration. It is not a question > that needs an answer. Tell that to the DBA. I bet s/he knows what "all standbys" means. The fact that the system doesn't know something doesn't make it unimportant. I agree that we don't absolutely need standby registration for some really basic version of synchronous replication. But I think we'd be better off biting the bullet and adding it. I think that without it we're going to resort to a series of increasingly grotty and user-unfriendly hacks to make this work. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: