Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=KHxn_Ty7vqVMtCjtvG39N8y=+=js84wnqOogw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64?
Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:35, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > ... and if so, isn't postmaster.c's code to transfer a HANDLE value to a > child process all wet? It is definitely 64-bit. sizeof(HANDLE)==8. So yes, it looks completely broken. I guess Windows doesn't actually *assign* you a handle larger than 2^32 until you actually ahve that many open handles. Typical values on my test system (win64) comes out at around 4000 in all tests. > BTW, it seems like it'd be a good thing if we had a Win64 machine in the > buildfarm. Yes. I actually thought we had one. Dave, weren't you going to set one up? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: