Re: Path question
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Path question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=K1dNsiext1HHUAaQG9T43fiww1Th4RuRYZ+5p@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Path question (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Path question
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/9/23 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>: > All of this leaves me wondering why Greg ended up ifdefing out this > code in the first place. There's probably something I'm missing > here... but for now I can't think of a better idea than just removing > the #ifdefs and hoping that whatever problem they were causing was > limited to an earlier version of the code that no longer exists. ...and FAIL. I missed the blindingly obvious here, which is that without these tests commented out, while it passes regression tests, the merge append stuff stops working. I think for some reason without this stuff in there the appropriate index paths fail to get generated for the child rels. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: