Re: small smgrcreate cleanup patch
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: small smgrcreate cleanup patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTi=FH5uR=1d4tG-MgrMpwu7=FV370AtcWPNA8bXr@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: small smgrcreate cleanup patch (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: small smgrcreate cleanup patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 20/08/10 16:30, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> I really like the idea of trying to use network-based storage in some >> way. Gigabit Ethernet is a big I/O channel. > > NFS? I don't particularly trust NFS to be either reliable or performant for database use. Do you? And what if you want additional functionality, like sharding or mirroring? ISTM that something built around a custom protocol that mimics exactly what we need from the smgr layer would be a lot easier to set up and a lot easier to be confident in. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: