Re: Ticket 269: Add support for 9.1 ALTER TYPE new syntax for enum
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ticket 269: Add support for 9.1 ALTER TYPE new syntax for enum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=EScCwjAfQN6BbBDFL6nGcN2Fjg9bzW695fWNm@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Ticket 269: Add support for 9.1 ALTER TYPE new syntax for enum (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Ticket 269: Add support for 9.1 ALTER TYPE
new syntax for enum
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le 30/10/2010 10:25, Dave Page a écrit : > >> Yeah, that's really nasty. I guess we need split the commands at ;. > > Yeah. If it's not between quotes. I don't like it at all, but I don't > see another way of doing it. > >> I guess we should pass a flag down somehow to tell the function that >> executes the query to do that and then we could also potentially get >> rid of the double SQL boxes. I'm not looking at the code, but I >> suspect that'll be nasty. >> > > We actually aren't required to add such a flag. We can check if the > query contains "ALTER TYPE", and "ADD AFTER" or "ADD BEFORE". That's knowledge I'd rather avoid hardwiring into the lower level machinery here. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: