Re: General migration question
От | Greg Spiegelberg |
---|---|
Тема | Re: General migration question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=EApRWsqOOkfM323eoXX_C7+5kQcrnxBht71XA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: General migration question (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: General migration question
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Greg Spiegelberg's message of mar ago 31 09:04:18 -0400 2010: >> Probably questions best asked on hackers but I figure many are represented here. >> Will there ever be a release where a dump-restore is not necessary? >> Perhaps, at least, minor releases (e.g. 9.0 to 9.1) will not require a >> dump-restore? > > 9.0 to 9.1 is not a minor release. 9.0.0 to 9.0.1 is a minor release, > and this doesn't require a dump/reload, but it also doesn't have any new > features. 9.0 to 9.1 is just as major as 8.4 to 9.0 is. (The rule is: > a change in second digit is major release, a change in first digit is > marketing pressure) Okay, wrong terminology. I meant minor release as in Major.Minor.Maintenance. > You can upgrade in place using pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.0 (thus you > don't need dump/reload). In general, it will be possible to migrate > from one major version to the next with pg_upgrade starting with the > 8.4-to-9.0 jump. I knew of the pg_upgrade but it's the "in general" part that still makes it a possible bad pill to swallow. All I'm suggesting is lumping those things requiring a dump/restore together for major updates. Greg
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: