Re: directory archive format for pg_dump
От | José Arthur Benetasso Villanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: directory archive format for pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=AEi3F6jC0Zy3dG9njiwJJC8Y6V090-hMonyyn@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | directory archive format for pg_dump (Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: directory archive format for pg_dump
Re: directory archive format for pg_dump |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Dimitri and Joachim. I've looked the patch too, and I want to share some thoughts too. I've used http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch to guide my review. Submission review: I've apllied and compiled the patch successfully using the current master. Usability review: The dir format generated in my database 60 files, with different sizes, and it looks very confusing. Is it possible to use the same trick as pigz and pbzip2, creating a concatenated file of streams? Feature test: Just a partial review. I can dump / restore using lzf, but didnt stress it hard to check robustness. Performance review: Didnt test it hard too, but looks ok. Coding review: Just a shallow review here. >> I think I'd like to see a separate patch for the new compression >> support. Sorry about that, I realize that's extra work… Same feeling here, this is the 1st thing that I notice. The md5.c and kwlookup.c reuse using a link doesn't look nice either. This way you need to compile twice, among others things, but I think that its temporary, right? -- José Arthur Benetasso Villanova
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: