Re: libpq and Datums management with embedded C function
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq and Datums management with embedded C function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=A057jDrpsGRuf0u-eFn4hwbRekABGEOrakGSs@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | libpq and Datums management with embedded C function (Alessandro Candini <candini@meeo.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq and Datums management with embedded C function
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Alessandro Candini <candini@meeo.it> wrote: > I'm dealing witch a C function embedded into postgresql-9.0.2. > > I'm returning a set of rows and following the example here > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/xfunc-c.html everything works > fine, but only if I use the C string approach. > > I'm using libpq to retrieve data and something like this works fine: > snprintf(values[0], 16, "%s", PQgetvalue(funcctx->user_fctx, call_cntr, 0)); > because PQgetvalue returns an array of char. > > But if I want to get the original data as output, I have to deal with Datums > and I don't know how to do this with lippq. > Something like the following it doesn't work: > > Datum values[1]; > values[0] = (Datum) PQgetvalue(funcctx->user_fctx, call_cntr, 1); > snprintf(values[0], 16, "%s", PQgetvalue(funcctx->user_fctx, call_cntr, 0)); > > Have you got any idea of how to solve this...do you know another way to > perform a query indide the db without involve libpq? > I would prefer to use them because I can connect to several postgresql > instances. Have you ruled out dblink? Also for connecting to self it would be preferable to use SPI (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/spi.html) vs libpq. merlin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: