Re: odd postgresql performance (excessive lseek)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: odd postgresql performance (excessive lseek)
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTi=8Pkj-mgtcxv-1fyix5zECGock-rOn=G=NDXrU@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: odd postgresql performance (excessive lseek)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: odd postgresql performance (excessive lseek)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net> writes:
>> This is another situation where using pread would have saved a lot of
>> time and sped things up a bit, but failing that, keeping track of the
>> file position ourselves and only lseek'ing when necessary would also
>> help.
>
> No, it wouldn't; you don't have the slightest idea what's going on
> there.  Those lseeks are for the purpose of detecting the current EOF
> location, ie, finding out whether some other backend has extended the
> file recently.  We could get rid of them, but only at the cost of
> putting in some other communication mechanism instead.

I don't get it.  Why would be doing that in a tight loop within a
single backend?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?