Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=5oFX4qONrXRv2_--cTNE=T22mR+CgNem2V_DR@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/9/28 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: >>>>> FOR var IN [array variable | array expression] >>>>> LOOP > >> How about distinguishing it this way:? > >> FOR var IN ARRAY array_expression LOOP I see one problem - when you can use a constant array, then you will write two keywords ARRAY FOR var IN ARRAY ARRAY[...] LOOP iteration over cursor is supported now, and you don't write FOR var IN CURSOR cursorvar > > That occurred to me too, but it's got a small problem: it's not > impossible for ARRAY to be the first token of a valid scalar expression. > yes > But I guess you could get around that if you had to by putting the ARRAY > expression inside parens, and it would be a pretty darn unusual case > anyway. So this is probably the best choice. I don't agree - There isn't reason for complicating proposed syntax. The situation is relative simple and we are able to print a correct messages. regards Pavel Stehule I'm not thrilled with > David's suggestions of using FOREACH or ITERATE --- using a different > initial keyword makes it awkward to make generic statements about "all > types of FOR loop". > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: