Re: pgAdmin III commit: Revert the previous change that introduced sysSetti
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Revert the previous change that introduced sysSetti |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=5gdSe3+2s-6xVDzUpM5c4+OBS7MFdc6B_hx=R@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Revert the previous change that introduced sysSetti (Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote: > Attached patch makes changes described to write() variants. What do you think? > > I conducted a little test to verify that I correctly changed all call > sites - implicit casts can be tricky. Once I had finished changing the > function names and their call sites, I provided an overload of write > with const wxChar*, complete with implementation/definition. I then > provided just a declaration of all the old overloads of write(). I > wanted to see if I got any linker errors. The idea of the wxChar* > variant (the one with the implementation) is to prevent any > write(const wxString&, const wxChar*) calls from calling my > write(bool) declaration, as they prefer that to write(const wxString&, > const wxString&) . Anyway, none of the old declarations were called, > and I saw no linker errors. > > -- > Regards, > Peter Geoghegan > -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: