Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw
От | Itagaki Takahiro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=5coHzHv=+-PgmHxZhn3TqvHTSX9SszbvpcE2O@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw
Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:12, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: >> From a functional and code structure perspective, I find this ready to commit. >> (I assume you'll drop the XXX: indent only comments on commit.) Kevin, did you >> want to do that performance testing you spoke of? > > OK, so is this Ready for Committer, or we're still working on it? Basically, we have no more tasks until the FDW core API is applied. COPY API and file_fdw patches are waiting for it. If we extend them a little more, I'd raise two items: * Should we print foreign table names in error messages? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-02/msg00427.php * COPY encoding patch was rejected, but using client_encoding is logically wrong for file_fdw. We might need subset of thepatch for file_fdw. -- Itagaki Takahiro
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: