Re: Forums at postgresql.com.au
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Forums at postgresql.com.au |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=4vjkWnedR_MQrZbSwcLCvLDD1RDkdrkf9M6cW@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Forums at postgresql.com.au (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 16:14, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Dave Page's message of vie nov 19 11:43:34 -0300 2010: >> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Elliot Chance <elliotchance@gmail.com> wrote: >> > However if I had signed up to the forum (and not the mailing list) my From would have to be subscribed for the mailinglist to accept it like: >> > Elliot Chance <forums@postgresql.com.au> >> > John Smith <forums@postgresql.com.au> >> > ... etc. >> > >> > OK, so after a brief background I'd like to organise a solution. Without any other feasible option would this genericaddress system be allowed? >> >> I wouldn't be happy with that as it prevents private replies to the >> author and would make it easy to send what was intended as a private >> reply to the public forums by mistake. > > Isn't that a secondary use case, though? It would be easy to solve this > by providing a URL to the post in the forum that you can click; assuming > the forum interface gives you the option to reply privately. That would pretty much make it impossible to use offline. That would be annoying, but I guess survivable. But how would that work for a user that hasn't signed up for the forum? How does it verify the sender? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: