Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTi=2X8ZQ=yGmrLTHQ7U-XKB_EP4GKEi2ZV9Pi59W@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Gorshkov <gorshkovlists@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>
>> Yes they're useful, but like a plastic bad covering a broken car window,
>> they're useful because they cover something that's inherently broken.
>>
>
> Awesome.  Now we have a car anology, with a funny typo no less.  "Plastic
> bad", I love it.  This is real progress toward getting all the common list
> argument idioms aired out.  All we need now is a homage to Mike Godwin and
> we can close this down.

It's not so much a car analogy as a plastic bad analogy.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Mielke
Дата:
Сообщение: Does auto-analyze work on dirty writes? (was: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...)
Следующее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...