Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS?
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTi=2BbwMxvC7YqVTFMxJJUHuf-bWk1_+Mv=QNV76@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS?
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:01, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>
>>> So, did ssl_ciphers go away on purpose? =A0If so, why? =A0If not, why i=
sn't
>>> it
>>> accessible?
>>
>> Are you sure you're on an SSL enabled build?
>
> Oh, good call ... I thought I'd installed the SSL build, but apparently n=
ot.
>
> Mind you, we *also* need a doc patch. ("This parameter is only available =
if
> PostgreSQL was built with SSL support").
Actually, I think it'd be more user friendly to make the parameter
still exist and be a no-op (maybe show the value NULL?) on non-SSL
enabled builds. Same goes for all other parameters that depend on a
specific compile flag. That would make life easier on automated tools
*and* on people sitting down at a new installation.
Thoughts?
--=20
=A0Magnus Hagander
=A0Me: http://www.hagander.net/
=A0Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: