Re: Trac tickets
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Trac tickets |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=1j7D_y6K28LFSjNoO-Jxd+3k_iruD5tVy+cP0@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Trac tickets (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Trac tickets
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > No to trac reports as they ain't complete now. Dave and I talked about > that in Stuttgart, and we decided that quick bugs to fix won't have a > trac ticket. We'll only use trac's bugtracker to keep track of unfixed bugs. > > I would be much more in favor to drop the changelog and use "git log" > instead. > >> (Hint: I hate the changelog file because I keep forgetting to update >> it, and it sucks to handle it in the main repo due to how it >> integrates with branches) >> > > Can't agree more :) The CHANGELOG is supposed to be a list of "changes that are interesting to the user", ie. the changes that we include in release notices etc. Git log includes a ton of extra stuff, and would require significant manual filtering at release time to produce the change log data. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: