Re: ssl file permission
| От | Rob Sargent |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ssl file permission |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AA9B61E4-0611-45A7-A5D0-460E2E0C9887@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ssl file permission (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ssl file permission
|
| Список | pgsql-docs |
Sorry. Execute permission for owner may have been on prior to chmod og-rwx . I thought that might be a problem and 600 eliminates that
On Sep 26, 2020, at 9:29 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 1:23 PM PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/libpq-ssl.html
Description:
The instruction to use "chmod og-rwx" could leave the file with read
permission set. Elsewhere the suggestion is "chmod 600".Not sure what you mean here -- how could it leave it with read permission set?(Obviously it could for the owner, but 0600 also includes read permissions for the owner)That said, it might be a good idea to be consistent since we seem to use a mix of different styles of chmod.--
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: