Re: [ODBC] New driver options in 7.01.0007

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:Inoue@tpf.co.jp]
> Sent: 24 September 2001 08:48
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; 'pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org'
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] New driver options in 7.01.0007
>
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:Inoue@tpf.co.jp]
> > > Sent: 24 September 2001 01:48
> > > To: Johann Zuschlag
> > > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> > > Subject: Re: [ODBC] New driver options in 7.01.0007
> > >
> > >
> > > My work about updatable cursors may lose the
> > > meaing by a backend's change. My plan depends
> > > on the combination of TID and OID but OIDs would
> > > be optional in 7.2.
> >
> > What?? OIDs optional?? That will *seriously* break pgAdmin at first
> > thought. If anyone can give more info on this it would be
> appreciated
> > as I can't seem to get to the list archives at the moment.
>
> The following system tables don't have OIDs.
>
>     relname     | relhasoids
> ----------------+------------
>  pg_attribute   | f
>  pg_group       | f
>  pg_inherits    | f
>  pg_index       | f
>  pg_amop        | f
>  pg_amproc      | f
>  pg_largeobject | f
>  pg_listener    | f
>  pg_shadow      | f
>  pg_attrdef     | f
>  pg_description | f
>  pg_relcheck    | f
>  pg_statistic   | f

Thanks Hiroshi. That's less of a problem than I first imagined, but it will
probably still break pgAdmin completely.

I assume there's a good reason for removing them?

Regards, Dave.