Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise |
Дата | |
Msg-id | A9C5E914-8D1D-468F-8693-FC0B26745DCE@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Jul 24, 2007, at 7:34 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > It kind of depends. The reality is, regardless of what all of us Pg > zealots would like to think, is that MySQL is now buzzword > compliant. It really doesn't matter a hoot whether or not the > buzzword compliance is of a solid implementation or not. Seems buzzword compliance is never based on actual merit... > But then again, it hasn't hurt us yet and I don't think it will. I > would rather have 1000 customers who make intelligent decisions > about their infrastructure than 5000 that are ignorant buffoons who > spend more time listening to sales people than actually making > knowledgeable decisions. FreeBSD used to be far superior to Linux in almost every way. Then Linux became buzzword complaint, a lot of big companies spent a lot of money on it, and it's now equal to or superior to FreeBSD in almost any measure. This is already becoming a threat to PostgreSQL; witness all the stuff that Google has released for MySQL. Fortunately our open community and BSD license has allowed commercial companies to readily produce a lot of improvements for PostgreSQL... but imagine what would happen if a really major company was to decide it needed to drastically improve MySQL... we could easily end up becoming the worlds 2nd most advanced open-source database. -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: