On Sep 14, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> Is this something we can do now, no matter the outcome of the
>> discussion?
>>
>
> Why not? I have zero problem with the FAQ amendment I suggested.
>
> Q. What is the official name of the project?
> A. PostgreSQL, but we accept Postgres as an official shortened
> version.
>
> I have not seen a single argument against the above and it has been
> mentioned by other people (although the wording my be slightly
> different).
It seems like a good FAQ addition. The only downside I can see
to adopting the two names as equally valid ways to describe PG is:
Q. So... what is "QL" then?
A. Aaaarrrrgggghhhh!
Cheers,
Steve