Re: JBoss w/int8 primary keys in postgres ...
От | James Robinson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JBoss w/int8 primary keys in postgres ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | A8C792B6-E3AF-11D7-8513-000A9566A412@socialserve.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | JBoss w/int8 primary keys in postgres ... (James Robinson <jlrobins@socialserve.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: JBoss w/int8 primary keys in postgres ...
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:31:53, Paul Thomas wrote: > Is there any way we could find out for definite? Until this index/type > cast issue is sorted out I don't see any way that PostgreSQL can even > be > considered ready for enterprise use. EJB/CMP is an important enterprise > technology and int8 index columns are not unknown in big company > databases. I ran 7.4B2 a few days ago, and it did not act any different than 7.3 does -- that is, the problem still exists in the backend. Shall I petition hackers, stating that EJB/CMP is not a fly-by-night technology (rather, more like the COBOL of our generation), and that postgres would make a great backend for something like JBoss, or any DB-neutral relational persistence generation framework using any of the available interfaces, not just JDBC, if this issue was solved once and for all? Or will we be told 'show us the backend code that passes the regression tests', which is a valid response.
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: