Re: pg_listening_channels()
| От | Igor Neyman |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_listening_channels() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | A76B25F2823E954C9E45E32FA49D70EC08F068FE@mail.corp.perceptron.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_listening_channels() (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_listening_channels()
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 6:13 PM > To: Igor Neyman > Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane; pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_listening_channels() > > Igor Neyman <ineyman@perceptron.com> writes: > > With PG 9.0 changes I lost ability to check if anyone is interested > in the NOTIFY signal and payload I'm about to send. > > Seems like this change was not thought through completely. > > [ shrug... ] It was debated extensively and the advantages of the new > implementation were deemed to outweigh the disadvantages. > > regards, tom lane Tom, Are you saying that these two features: attached payload and being able to find which channels are being listened to - areincompatible? That they cannot coexist? Regards, Igor Neyman
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: