Re: Detecting query timeouts properly
От | Albe Laurenz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Detecting query timeouts properly |
Дата | |
Msg-id | A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B17D4CEFF@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Detecting query timeouts properly (Evan Martin <postgresql@realityexists.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Evan Martin wrote: > I'm using PostgreSQL 9.2.8 via Npgsql 2.2.0. When a query times out it > returns error 57014 with the message "canceling statement due to > statement timeout". I use the message to detect the timeout and re-try > in some cases. It seems a bit wrong to rely on the message, though - I > presume the message text is subject to change between releases. Is there > a better way? I cannot just rely on code 57014, because the same code is > used when the user cancels the query (eg. from pgAdmin), in which case I > don't want to re-try. I don't think that there is a good way to disambiguate that, and I agree that parsing the error message text is not a very robust solution. Is it really necessary to bother with the case that a statement is explicitly canceled? That should not happen too often, and if you have statement_timeout set to non-zero, queries should not "hang" indefinitely long anyway, right? Yours Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: