Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | A719AE5B0485F547A2F37F26364186503E68C374@MX15A.corp.emc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: gsstark@gmail.com [mailto:gsstark@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Greg Stark > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 4:14 PM > To: McDevitt, Charles > Cc: sfrost@snowman.net; alvherre@commandprompt.com; > greg@2ndquadrant.com; mbanck@debian.org; tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us; > andrew@dunslane.net; jd@commandprompt.com; pgsql- > hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:07 AM, <Charles.McDevitt@emc.com> wrote: > >> This is just libelous FUD. There's absolutely no reason postgres would > >> have to be GPL'd to satisfy any library license. > > > > Ok, but be aware that readline is GPL v3, not GPL v2, and has those additional > requirements. > > No What? From the GNU Readline home page: "Readline is free software, distributed under the terms of the GNU General PublicLicense, version 3." I know it used to be GPLv2, but that isn't true these days.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: