Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | A6157072-B564-4171-8599-068C8D65BE9C@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Nov 16, 2021, at 7:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > True; as long as the expectation is that entries will exist for only > a tiny subset of GUCs, it's probably fine. I understand that bloating a frequently used catalog can be pretty harmful to performance. I wasn't aware that the sizeof an infrequently used catalog was critical. This new catalog would be used during GRANT SET ... and GRANT ALTER SYSTEMcommands, which should be rare, and potentially consulted when SET or ALTER SYSTEM commands are issued. Is there amore substantial performance impact to this than I'm aware? It can be a bit challenging to run performance tests on suchthings, given the way everything interacts with everything else. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: