Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
От | Andrus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds |
Дата | |
Msg-id | A44943E272DF48CC9BC306C513387020@andrusnotebook обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Alvaro, > Are you really using vacuum_cost_delay=2000? If so, therein lies your > problem. That's a silly value to use for that variable. Useful values > are in the 20-40 range probably, or maybe 10-100 being extremely > generous. Thank you. My 8.1.4 postgresql.conf does not contain such option. So vacuum_cost_delay is off probably. Since doc does not recommend any value, I planned to use 2000 Will value of 30 allow other clients to work when VACUUM FULL is running ? Uncommented relevant values in postgresql.conf file are: shared_buffers = 15000 work_mem = 512 maintenance_work_mem = 131072 fsync = on effective_cache_size= 70000 log_min_duration_statement= 30000 Andrus.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: