Re: No SPF record for postgresql.org?
От | Justin Clift |
---|---|
Тема | Re: No SPF record for postgresql.org? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | A3CDB380-1233-4FC3-BD00-A3CBD6C31D3D@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | No SPF record for postgresql.org? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: No SPF record for postgresql.org?
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On 16 Oct 2016, at 19:28, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I've been tinkering with setting up SPF-based filtering on my mail > server, and I was surprised to find out that most of the traffic > it would want to throw away is Postgres mailing list messages. > Why is it that there's no SPF record for postgresql.org? I realize > that there's debate about how useful SPF actually is, but surely > that's not a reason not to publish an SPF entry. As an extra data point, the lack of SPF and DKIM for postgresql.org is a bit of a pain when using @postgresql.org email address too. :( Especially to Yahoo email users. Maybe thankfully, Yahoo might not be a problem for that much longer. ;) + Justin -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: