Re: freebsd/softupdates for data dir
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: freebsd/softupdates for data dir |
Дата | |
Msg-id | A3A08921-7B37-448A-8F34-A921FECC8BC8@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: freebsd/softupdates for data dir (Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: freebsd/softupdates for data dir
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Apr 4, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Vivek Khera wrote: > On Apr 3, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > >> I've always left them on, and never had any issues...(even after >> unscheduled power loss - which happened here yesterday). As I >> understand it, the softupdate code reorders *metadata* operations, >> and does not alter data operations - so the effect of fysnc(2) on >> a preexisting file is not changed by softupdates being on or off. > > This is also my understanding, and I also leave softupdates on for > the data partition. Even if it doesn't improve performance, it > will not reduce it, and otherwise does no harm with respect to > postgres' disk usage. More importantly, it allows the system to come up and do fsck in the background. If you've got a large database that's a pretty big benefit. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: