Re: JSON for PG 9.2

On Dec 19, 2011, at 9:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote:

>> +1, though I think the core type will at least need some basic operators and indexing support.
>
> And I'm willing to do that, but I thought it best to submit a bare
> bones patch first, in the hopes of minimizing the number of
> objectionable things therein.  For example, if you want to be able to
> index a JSON column, you have to decide on some collation order that
> is consistent with JSON's notion of equality, and it's not obvious
> what is most logical.  Heck, equality itself isn't 100% obvious.  If
> there's adequate support for including JSON in core, and nobody
> objects to my implementation, then I'll throw some ideas for those
> things up against the wall and see what sticks.

+1 Sounds good to me.

David