Re: Licensing question
| От | Saravanan Bellan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Licensing question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | A37D6E7E941A1E498B4B98F3E4AFA92035CB02@MAIL.design2deploy.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Licensing question (Antti Oikarinen <amo@mail.student.oulu.fi>) |
| Список | pgsql-cygwin |
I dont understand the portion, "launching Cygwin and PostgreSQL as services" Can my commerical application's installer copy over the Cygwin dll's and have my service start the PostgreSQL database, as long I ship the Cygwin and PostgreSQL sources with the distribution. Thanks, -----Original Message----- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@tishler.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:49 AM To: Antti Oikarinen Cc: pgsql-cygwin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [CYGWIN] Licensing question Andy, Again, IANAL... On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 01:00:35PM +0300, Antti Oikarinen wrote: > if i deploy PostgreSQL with a commercial application, using Cygwin for > PostgreSQL, do i need to purchase a license or should my application > comply to Open Source specification? Can i avoid the need to purchase a > license or to go Open Source by, for example, launching Cygwin and > PostgreSQL as services, without any contact between my application and > Cygwin, only connecting to PostgreSQL through JDBC? Yes, this is exactly what we were going to do with a product from my previous employer. Unfortunately, there was downsizing, so the product never saw the light of day. Nevertheless, I believe that we would have been fully complying with the licensing requirements. > Cygwin home pages are unfortunately very obscure when it comes to > licensing (and they aren't replying to questions on the subject...). In > many places it says it's GPL, but from elsewhere in the site you get a > very different picture. I asked an expert and even he couldn't come up > with a certain answer right away. I found these two messages from these > archives: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2002-02/msg00118.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2002-02/msg00119.php I can't say much more than the above -- just provide the required source (i.e., Cygwin, PostgreSQL, etc.) which is *not* your application source in this case. > .. and these look very promising. However, i'd be grateful for any more > detailed information on the subject and the conclusion. When it comes to > licenses, one can't be too careful :) Agreed! Jason ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
В списке pgsql-cygwin по дате отправления: