Re: Feature matrix filter

On 13 March 2014 15:04, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:

On 30 May 2013 23:12, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:

On 30 May 2013 11:33, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:

That should be the case with the "hide unchanged features" checkbox

checked anyway.  The rule is, if it's the same value across all

displayed versions (regardless of whether they're all "Yes", "No" or

"Obsolete"), the row becomes hidden.

Yeah, I get that. I'm just suggesting that obsolete features should be

treated differently, as they're even less interesting than something

that was implemented before the first version show.

Well it still seems like an unnecessary complication of yet another

checkbox for the sake of 6 affected features.  I could add it if you

really want it.  The rule would be that if any of the displayed

versions for a particular feature contain "Obsolete" then the row is

hidden.

Regardless of that, I do think that checkbox should be on it's own line.  And everything centred to look tidier.

Latest version does that.

And while we're doing this, would we want to add 7.4 back in?  It's in

the database anyway, or is it just too old?

So, with 9.4 coming up later this year, the feature matrix will be

overflowing many screens.

I've rebased the old patch and also included jQuery rather than

referring to a Google-hosted copy.

Works for me :-)

Any objections to me committing this?

--
Thom