Re: Extended protocol logging

On 1-Nov-06, at 6:18 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:

> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
>>> These are logs from Beta 2.
>>
>> With what logging settings?  log_duration has rather different  
>> behavior
>> from what it used to do.
>
> I think it would be useful to have the log results from a test program
> in the protocol section, so interface designers know what will get
> logged from various protocol sequences.

I think some sort of examples are in order, or more consistency.
>
> That way JDBC people and others can interpret what their own  
> interfaces
> should look like for 8.2
from a JDBC point of view we don't look at the logs in the API. I am  
just debugging something
>
> -- 
>   Simon Riggs
>   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>
>