Re: Win32 regression test status
От | Claudio Natoli |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Win32 regression test status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F365@harris.memetrics.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Win32 regression test status
|
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Hi guys, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Agreed, we don't add them to all joins, but don't we historically add > > ORDER BY to queries that are shown to be sensitive to qsort > > implementations on various platforms? Are you suggesting we create a > > separate regression output file for that platform? > > I'm not suggesting any particular solution yet, just pointing out that > there are reasons to look for alternatives rather than automatically > adding ORDER BY. Doesn't seem to be a consensus here, so: Tom, I'm happy at looking at whatever alternatives you can suggest. Bruce, failing the above, I'm happy to check + provide the required ORDER BY patch. Cheers, Claudio --- Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see <a href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em ailpolicy.html</a>
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: