Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Claudio Natoli
Тема Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Дата
Msg-id A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F2F1@harris.memetrics.local
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Список pgsql-hackers-win32
> Well, I'd say that depends on what the general direction is for the Unix
> version. Do we want everything on the commandline, in the env, or both.
> We should follow whatever is wanted there, IMHO.  And if everything is
> not available on the commandline, and *should not be*, then we need to
> do something special for win32 there. Such as a registry key.

In the backend, I see getenv calls for the following:
    "PATH"
    "PGDATA"
    "PGPORT"
    "PGDATESTYLE"
    "TZ"
    "PGCLIENTENCODING"

PATH is irrelevant (if you inspect findbe.c, you'll see that registering the
postmaster service with the full path name, as would only be sensible in any
case, avoids any issues here), and PGDATA is a command line arg. PGPORT is
also a command line arg, and, like the remaining three, can be set using the
respective GUC variable (amusingly, the related code in guc.c mentions that
the reason these parameters can also be set via env vars is "for historical
reasons").

AFAICS this is a non-issue.

Cheers,
Claudio

---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary