Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
От | Claudio Natoli |
---|---|
Тема | Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary |
Дата | |
Msg-id | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F2EA@harris.memetrics.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I'm not clear *which* settings it is proposed to set in the registry, > nor how possible it will be to override the settings, and with which > mechanism. I pretty much agree with Andrew here. Frankly, I think this whole discussion "registry vs env" is a bit pointless. What *exactly* does anyone think will need to be put in the registry? Surely, our Win32 service wrapper can just allow something like this: postgres /regserver servicename <command line args go here> So, if I want to have multiple servers registered, I could do: postgres /regserver MyPGServer_1 -D c:/data1 postgres /regserver MyPGServer_2 -D c:/data2 and so on. (FWIW, I'm doing this already) And of course, you can always run another instance from the command line, or have a single instance registered that takes all its args from the environment, or ... Cheers, Claudio --- Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see <a href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em ailpolicy.html</a>
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: