Re: fork/exec
От | Claudio Natoli |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fork/exec |
Дата | |
Msg-id | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F2B4@harris.memetrics.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | fork/exec (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: fork/exec
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> It needs rewritten. The hacks inserted for ExecBackend have largely > destroyed the former structure (such as it was), and the lack of any > commentary added with said hacks didn't help. I am thinking > of tackling that rewrite once the dust has settled. Anything in particular? With your SubPostmaster suggestion, the split of BackendRun (ne: BackendFork) and BackendInit could now be undone (and I had a TODO item to ask the list if such a reversion was desirable, and provide said patch)... but other than that I don't see where any former structure re: backend creation has been destroyed. Cheers, Claudio --- Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see <a href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em ailpolicy.html</a>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: