Re: How to make a REALLY FAST db server?
От | Ian Linwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to make a REALLY FAST db server? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9urrptosorr0vsf9d9bdnbjdbl4p6vumva@4ax.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How to make a REALLY FAST db server? (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)) |
Ответы |
Re: How to make a REALLY FAST db server?
Re: How to make a REALLY FAST db server? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:14:33 +0000 (UTC), teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) wrote: >> - Hardware: dual / quad Intel class > >Athlon gives more bang for the buck - the dual Athlons are _really_ >nice, and have proven stable as well. > Agreed, single Athlons are much better than single Intels, but I still think Intel win in the SMP game. As for stability, I think it's a tad too early to make such a statement. >> - Disk: SCSI Raid 1+0 > >I'd probably go for a 3ware RAID instead... IDE disks are so much >cheaper nowadays than SCSI, and the premium isn't really justifiable >anymore. > Aargh, No! SCSI is MUCH better under load and more reliable. I've yet to see an enterprise server utilise IDE raid. >> - OS: Prolly FreeBSD (FFS is your friend (what with syncs and all) and it >> can do multi proc support > >I'd recommend Linux, which has more mature MP support and scales >better, but I'm obviously biased :). It's of course very important to >keep what you are familiar with - a good sysadmin makes a world of >difference no matter what you're using. I'd recommend Solaris, which has MUCH more mature MP support! Linux still has a way to go (although it's getting there very quickly). If you do decide to use Linux, check out ReiserFS file system.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: