Re: Timestamp indexes aren't used for ">="
От | Jeff Boes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Timestamp indexes aren't used for ">=" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9sok6l$ek7$1@news.tht.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Timestamp indexes aren't used for ">=" (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Timestamp indexes aren't used for ">="
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
In article <20011109145054.H59285-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com>, "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> wrote: > How many rows are in the table? Have you run vacuum analyze? Sorry, that information was in the original post, but perhaps you missed it: In article <9shhnf$23ks$1@news.tht.net>, "Jeff Boes" <jboes@nexcerpt.com> wrote: > We have a table which has approximately 400,000 rows. It has 17 columns, > and 4 indexes. The primary key is a int4 (filled by a sequence), > additionally we have two more int4 indexes and a timestamp index. Yes, VACUUM ANALYZE gets run every 24 hours, and currently the table grows by some 25K-40K rows per day. Could a factor be the time elapsed between the VACUUM and the query? -- Jeff Boes vox 616.226.9550 Database Engineer fax 616.349.9076 Nexcerpt, Inc. jboes@nexcerpt.com
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: