Exploring sequences (sequence context within a transaction)
От | NetBeans |
---|---|
Тема | Exploring sequences (sequence context within a transaction) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9fi16e$2fj2$1@news.tht.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Exploring sequences (sequence context within a
transaction)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I searched through mailing list archives but was unable to find full coverage of this question -- my apologies if this is a reposted question. As in the FAQ, I am trying to retrieve the value of a sequence value from a newly inserted row. So, first I call something like: insert into foobar (foo, bar) values (nextval('foobar_foo_seq'), 'whatever'); Then, I want to retrieve the value that generated from the sequence and inserted into the table, so I use a call to currval: insert into foobar_rel_table(foo_fk, baz) values (currval('foobar_foo_seq', 'something else'); This is (one of the methods that is) prescribed in the FAQ. However, I'm concerned that another transaction attempting to insert into the same table might make a call to nextval('foobar_foo_seq') between the two operations above. This would mean that my second statement would use the wrong value from the sequence. I've tested this scenario with different transaction isolation levels, and it appears that any state changes to sequences become immediately visible to other transactions (obviously, a read-commited type strategy wouldn't work, however, serializing access to sequences, or explicit locking would solve this problem). Has anyone else come across this problem, and is there a workaround? If not, are there any alternate suggestions for generating a PK on insert and immediately retrieving it that is free from concurrency issues? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! -- Erik -- Erik Pearson erik@cariboulake.com http://www.cariboulake.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: